Vegetarian Heart Attacks in India

http://www.stumbleupon.com/s/#5tVqDO/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19676146?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum/

Interesting observational study. Good example that these studies can be useful to form opinions for the purpose of testing via an intervention study, but cannot be used to determine causality. In this case, though, interesting counter intuitive information about the supposedly well known causes of cancer.

Taubes' Work Goes Mainstream

Ode to Gary Taubes. This is so obvious, I can't believe we all fell for it. If working harder didn't make you hungrier, every lumberjack, athlete, and Naval Aviator would be dead from under nourishment. Obviously, if you work harder, the body compensates with appetite. The first time realized this truth, I felt like an idiot for falling for the 'burning off the calories' idea. "Hey Paul, ever hear of 'working up an appetite?'" WE ALL KNOW IT"S WRONG BUT STILL FELL FOR IT!

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1914857,00.html

A Great Cut from Dr. Mike Eades' Blog; Don't Do This To Yourself!

We started each day with a quick breakfast at Louisa’s, a little restaurant close to the office where we spent our days. One of the menu selections, fittingly enough, was called Mike’s Special, so how could I resist. Especially when it was such a great low-carb option: two poached eggs on a bowl of sauteed spinach, red and green peppers and onions. Good, good, good. It came, of course, with a giant piece of toast that was at least an inch thick, which I ate a couple of bites of just to try.

As we were eating breakfast on the last morning, a man was eating alone while reading the paper at the table next to us. He looked to be about 70 or so and was fairly thin with a pot belly. He had on two pressure stockings on his lower legs and bruising in the crook of one of his arms from where, obviously, blood had recently been taken.

Watching him eat, I created an entire story about him that I’ll bet is not too far from the mark. Even if it is not accurate in this man’s case, it is totally (and sadly) accurate in many thousands of others.

The man was eating a bowl of oatmeal. He had a glass of skim milk so fat free it was almost blue that he poured little bits of into his cereal from time to time. Along with his oatmeal, he was eating one of the giant pieces of toast the restaurant serves. He took one pat of butter (I assume there was no margarine available) and cut it in half. He carefully spread one half pat on one half of his toast then loaded it with an entire individual serving of jelly. After eating the first half piece of toast, he prepared the second half the same way and ate it. The only fat he got from his entire meal was that that came from that one pat of butter. Based on the size of the bowl of oatmeal and the size of the toast (and the skim milk), I calculated that this guy consumed about 100 grams of carbohydrate. (Thirty grams in the oatmeal; at least 30 in the toast; 15 in each container of jelly; and about 10 in the skim milk.)

I imagine (here is where I’m speculating) that he has elevated cholesterol and has been told by his doctor to watch his fat. And he is complying. He got a whopping 4 grams of fat in his one pat of butter (36 calories-worth) while getting 100 grams of carb in the rest of his meal (400 calories-worth). The tiny bit of fat he got contained short-chain fatty acids that are immune enhancing whereas the 100 grams of carb he got provided really no health benefit. Since the 100 grams represents 20 times the amount of sugar circulating in his blood, his pancreas had to release a large amount of insulin to deal with it. His pot belly indicates that he is already insulin resistant with an abdomen full of visceral fat, so he no doubt secreted a lot more insulin than a person without insulin resistance. This excess insulin help him store fat in his liver, increase his level of visceral fat, ratchet up the inflammatory process, injure his blood vessels even more and increase his risk for heart disease, the very thing his doctor was trying to prevent by putting him on a low-fat diet.

How much better off this guy would have been had he joined me in the Mike’s Special. But, his cardiologist, I’m sure, would have been apoplectic. A sad state of affairs indeed.

http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/cardiovascular-disease/hard-at-work-in-seattle/

So - deny yourself the food you like and which tastes best (like butter, eggs, and whole milk!), so you can poison yourself with two days' worth of carbs in one deadly sitting, and then feel like crap in the inflammatory cascade that results!! And not lose weight!!! And still have lousy fasting lipid profiles!!!!

Don't do this to yourself. Learn enough about food to know you should be eating protein and fat to satiety, with moderaate high quality carbs to balance that out.

Paleo Improves Insulin Sensitivity

Interesting study - another verfication of the Paleo Model for health.
http://www.stumbleupon.com/s/#5SMxWb/www.nature.com/ejcn/journal/v63/n8/abs/ejcn20094a.html/

Gary Taubes - Genius! #2

These pieces are de rigeur if one wishes to begin to understand the complexities and inadequacy of the current level of science on diet and health.

First is his "What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie?":

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/07/magazine/what-if-it-s-all-been-a-big-fat-lie.html?pagewanted=print

Second, the "The Soft Science of Dietary Fat":

http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/taubes.html

Dr. Scott Grundy's reply to "The Soft Science of Dietary Fat":
http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/grundy.html
It would be convincing if you didn't know how to read it.

The response to his response - devastating!
http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/ravnskov.html

Short version? It was soft science indeed.