http://www.mercola.com/beef/cla.htm
Pretty typical summary from Mercola, in which he touts the possible advantages of CLA consumption from grass fed beef, and skewers the industrial food chain and all of its adherants, sycophants and government enablers. Takaway: CLA seems to be good but evidence is minimal.
http://www.eatwild.com/cla.html
Takeaway: CLA as a supplement is as questionable as 98% of supplements, but the natural form is available in grass fed cattle and is another factor in a growing list of the differences in grass fed vice feedlot cattle products:
Where do you get CLA? Many people take a synthetic version that is widely promoted as a diet aid and muscle builder. New research shows that the type of CLA in the pills may have some potentially serious side effects, including promoting insulin resistance, raising glucose levels, and reducing HDL (good) cholesterol. (3)
Few people realize that CLA is also found in nature, and this natural form does not have any known negative side effects. The most abundant source of natural CLA is the meat and dairy products of grassfed animals. Research conducted since 1999 shows that grazing animals have from 3-5 times more CLA than animals fattened on grain in a feedlot. Simply switching from grainfed to grassfed products can greatly increase your intake of CLA. (4)
http://www.naturalnews.com/010126.html
A sad article, well written but from my perspective, terminally mis-informed. Nice discussion of CLA's possible benefits, but since the author's so poorly informed about saturated fats, it's hard to take anything in this article seriously.
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2007/01/30/21608.aspx
The author reviews two studies, one on rats and one on mice, which had mixed results from CLA supplementation. Takeaway: Don't supplement CLA if you are a rat or a mouse.
Link for this quote follows. Takaway: don't read The Health Ranger unless you like this sort of speculation.
The Health Ranger is one smart, passionate guy, and I think his advocacy is admirable; where we part is his advocacy of 'superfoods.' I don't see a lot of evidence that we're going to thrive by hunting down a bunch of so called superfoods, rather, the way to thrive is to avoid eating foods that damage us by intelligently applying the paleolithic model of nutrition. When I see anyone advocating a 'superfood' that comes in a quart container that's loaded with sugars, I can't take that advice or advisor seriously.
No comments:
Post a Comment